Every year, millions of people across the world die prematurely from tobacco use. Every one of these deaths is preventable.
In the United States, we’ve seen the impact that smart policies can have on tobacco use. Smoking rates are dropping and indoor air has become cleaner. Fewer young people are starting, more adult smokers are giving it up, and tobacco control policies are gaining ground. All of this is good for the health of Americans, and we see the promise of fewer deaths and less disease from tobacco use.
While progress has certainly been made in reducing tobacco use, there is much work to be done. Tobacco companies have turned their attentions to new products. E-cigarettes and snus are growing in popularity, but remain largely unregulated by the FDA. These companies have begun to focus on low- and middle-income countries where the tobacco epidemic continues to grow. These new trends may make you wonder:
- What will the impact of these new products be?
- Will the strategies that have worked in the United States work in other countries?
That’s where we come in.
Based at the University of Illinois at Chicago’s Health Policy Center, we conduct economic research to inform and shape tobacco control policies. We call it Tobacconomics.
Our team includes some of the brightest researchers on the economics of tobacco control policy. They are asking tough questions about what the future of tobacco control will look like, and their work is providing guidance for leaders and policy makers on effective interventions.
Making the case
When we learn what works, we can save lives and improve the economy. Because when people are healthier, they work more, produce more, buy more, and cost our health system less. All of which leads to a stronger economy. Explore what’s working in the global fight against tobacco »
Meet the team
Frank J. Chaloupka is a distinguished professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, where he is the director of the Health Policy Center. He is also the director of the World Health Organization’s Collaborating Center on the Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control, and co-Director of Bridging the Gap: … Read more »
Dr. Ce Shang is a Senior Research Scientist at the University of Illinois at Chicago Institute for Health Research and Policy’s Health Policy Center. Her research focuses on the economic analysis of health behaviors, with an emphasis on how taxes and policies impact physical activity and substance use and abuse. She … Read more »
Dianne C. Barker is President of Barker Bi-Coastal Health Consultants, Inc. (BBHC), which is a health policy consulting firm based in Los Angeles. She also serves as a principal investigator on several tobacco and obesity-related research and evaluation projects administered by the Public Health Institute. For more than two decades, … Read more »
“In my judgment, Frank Chaloupka has been the most creative and socially productive economist working on tobacco-control issues over the past two decades.”
— Kenneth E. Warner, Ph.D., Avedis Donabedian Distinguished University Professor of Public Health at the University of Michigan School of Public Health
Recent & Featured Research
Topics: Economic consequences / Economic impacts of tobacco control / Health consequences / Impact on demand / Prevalence and consumption / Tax and price / Tax levels and structure / Tobacco control policies and programs / Tobacco taxes revenues / Tobacco use
Topics: Cost-effectiveness / Economic consequences / Economic impacts of tobacco control / Health consequences / Impact on demand / Industry pricing / Minimum Pricing Policies / Prevalence and consumption / Tax and price / Tax levels and structure / Tobacco control policies and programs / Tobacco taxes revenues / Tobacco use
Topics: Cost-effectiveness / Economic consequences / Economic impacts of tobacco control / Impact on demand / Prevalence and consumption / Tax and price / Tax levels and structure / Tobacco control policies and programs / Tobacco taxes revenues / Tobacco use
- View all articles, publications, white papers, datasets and more in the research database »