Weight Control Belief and Its Impact on the Effectiveness of Tobacco Control Policies on Quit Attempts: Findings from the ITC 4 Country Project

Background: Weight concerns are widely documented as one of the major barriers for girls and young adult women to quit smoking. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether smokers who have weight concerns respond to tobacco control policies differently than smokers who do not in terms of quit attempts, and how this difference varies by gender and country.

Objective: This study aims to investigate, by gender and country, whether smokers who believe that smoking helps control weight are less responsive to tobacco control policies with regards to quit attempts than those who do not.

Methods: We use longitudinal data from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project in the USA, Canada, the UK and Australia to conduct the analysis. We first constructed a dichotomous indicator for smokers who have the weight control belief and then examined the disparity in policy responsiveness in terms of quit attempts by directly estimating the interaction terms of policies and the weight control belief indicator using generalised estimating equations.

Findings: We find that weight control belief significantly attenuates the policy impact of tobacco control measures on quit attempts among US female smokers and among UK smokers. This pattern was not found among smokers in Canada and Australia.

Conclusions: Although our results vary by gender and country, the findings suggest that weight concerns do alter policy responsiveness in quit attempts in certain populations. Policy makers should take this into account and alleviate weight concerns to enhance the effectiveness of existing tobacco control policies on promoting quitting smoking.

Read the press release or access the full article via Tobacco Control.

Note: tobaccocontrol.bmj.com requires a paid subscription

Please note: the download link will take you to tobaccocontrol.bmj.com, which requires a paid subscription to read the full article

February 2015

Authors:
Ce Shang
Frank J. Chaloupka
Geoffrey T. Fong
Mary Thompson
Mohammad Siahpush
William Ridgeway